Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Absoloootely, DQ! :thumb:

 

 

OK, thanks.  But how does a "final stage coupling" cap differ from an output cap?

 

Andy

 

In reference to what Bob Carver has one said, final stage coupling in multi-stage amplifiers (mostly tube triode based circuitry) it is after the interstage and just before the output stage. Output cap has many meanings and uses, in this scenario I'am talking about a strictly output cap as it's purpose for decoupling from a voltage out DAC to the output RCA connectors.

 

What series in the Jupiter line up? voltage rating?

The older flat stack might've been the HT series, rare ones rated in excess of 400v. Jupiter quickly discontinued the manufacturing methods for these and updated them quickly because lots of users reported them blowing up or melting faster then a candle due to heat tolerance issue. That was the end for me with using any Jupiter cap. I wouldn't touch one with a 50ft pole.

EDIT: Most likely have been 600v rated units. I mentioned it a while ago when I joined SNA in a Jupiter cap thread that I had problems with them.

 

That's what I thought, Mark!  But, in my view, DefQon regards himself as an 'expert' ... so I wanted to understand what his definition of the two was.

I'm no expert just a diyer. Maybe in a few years time when I have a 2nd degree in EE then maybe I can call myself a semi-expert. Read above on the two meanings.

 

 

Measurement nuts would disagree. 

 

Indeed.

Edited by DefQon

Posted

@, still liked the original Jupiters but as you said above there were heat issues. When I used them I was mindful of this and never had any problems.

Posted (edited)

Ah, so one of the older inferior series, they now have them in the 600v rating. ......but being replaced with the newer round type of construction.

Edited by ortofun
Posted (edited)

I made an earlier post of my DIY Boozhound Labs MC stage and said how good it was. I have some $427 X2 caps which need a home and thought this project maybe a good place for them. Resistors are Vishay and caps Nichion. The RCAs were over $80.

 

Here is the completed cct. brd. I was was raised on Veri-board. The RCAs are copper and expensive and will bring this build to the $1K mark. It better sound good.

post-108489-0-73875000-1442813234_thumb.

Edited by mwhouston
  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah, those AN caps bump the costing right up there :o  but they should sound pretty damn good I expect  :cool: 

Posted

@, where I found eXovers useful is for my stereo sub-woofers which I originally crossed at 50hz now crossing 100hz as part of a 2.5 way speaker setup. I don't believe any component can improve on the signal comming out of a CD player or whatever. All components, active or passive, only degrade the sound. Choose those which degrade it less and add the distortion you like.

In bold is where I have a different view to most folk, as how can a signal that is poor become richly detailed and tonally great...along with a sound stage that is much better...with only a cap change from what many consider good already, just doesn't add up for me......not without something more going on here.

 

Only my view :)

Posted

In bold is where I have a different view to most folk, as how can a signal that is poor become richly detailed and tonally great...along with a sound stage that is much better...with only a cap change from what many consider good already, just doesn't add up for me......not without something more going on here.

 

Only my view :)

 

It's adding distortion that is only pleasant to the ears of the individual whether he chooses to like it or not. Same saying goes what is one man's treasure is rubbish to another.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

@DefQonIf It's distortion It's distortion I like, but i don't like the distortion of some cheaper caps like axon and similar caps, they are just gritty like these ming da (re-badged SRC caps) ones that were in my mate's amp. Some caps distortion includes smearing and stuff like that also, i dislike those distortions too.......

 

One thing to note, is that like my mate said "i didn't know the sound was so distorted until now it is gone" This is what i have found at times also, some distortions are often only recognised by the ear as objectionable... once It's removed.

Edited by ortofun
Posted (edited)

Ready to lock it up and give it a go. Hookup wire is wire warp wire - silver plated fine copper wire. Loading is 50 or 100ohms by an external switch.

post-108489-0-92296800-1442841620_thumb.

post-108489-0-23038800-1442841624_thumb.

Edited by mwhouston
  • Like 1

Posted

can't really follow the logic of using these caps and not using similar quality power supply caps, wire and resistors. aside from this, the silver caps will take around 200 hours run in time before the start to sound how they should. are they the newer mylar version or the paper versions?

Posted

Finished another Smokey Headphone amp (a Cmoy/O2 mix), this one for 600 Ohms headphones. It hast a gain of 3.3 (roughly 10 dB), which works nice with the max volume on my Xperia. Ok, could have been a tiny bit more, but given that I'll use closed cans for this one, it's actually alright.

 

I combined it with a pair of newly acquired used Beyerdynamic DT770's, and they complete setup sounds astonishingly clear and balanced. I feared the closed design of the DT's would make them too boomy... nonsense, I'm very happy with the purchase and the build.

 

Some pics (and as per DVP's suggestion some time back, the LED lights up the cigar).

 

post-142307-0-69119400-1443241652_thumb.

 

post-142307-0-48978400-1443241665_thumb.

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

Just finished putting a little UCD180 amp together. Seems to work quite well so far. HXR regs give it a warm analog glow :cool:

 

 

 

 

post-141198-0-37326800-1443494579_thumb.

  • Like 4

Posted (edited)

lots of holes... :D

Heh yes indeed. They were supposed to be lined up neatly....didn't quite work out ;-)

Edited by Stevesie
  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished putting a little UCD180 amp together. Seems to work quite well so far. HXR regs give it a warm analog glow :cool:

 

What's the case? Doesn't need to be very big....

  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished putting a little UCD180 amp together. Seems to work quite well so far. HXR regs give it a warm analog glow :cool:

 

Which power supply are you using? Did you just connect the differential input to the RCA connectors in the back (tie the - or + to ground)?

 

Looks real nice.

 

Anyone in Oz sell these kits or you ordered them from the Hypex shop?

  • Like 1
Posted

Which power supply are you using? Did you just connect the differential input to the RCA connectors in the back (tie the - or + to ground)?

 

Looks real nice.

 

Anyone in Oz sell these kits or you ordered them from the Hypex shop?

 

Cheers. It's the Hypex SMPS400180A power supply. Yep the - input is tied to ground at the case/rca junction - this arrangement seems to work fine and has enough gain fed straight from the output of an ES9023 dac chip. I bought all the parts from Hypex directly. Not cheap, but decent quality gear. I'm not sure if anyone does kits.

 

I have a smaller module that is used in the NAD D3020 and a Connexelectronic SMPS to make a more compact amp at a later stage(see pic). I have a back injury and can no longer move my Rotel so the lightweight Class D/SMPS combo is perfect!

post-141198-0-90687400-1443510942_thumb.

  • Like 1

Posted (edited)

@Stevesie; I have only ever driven my many Ds by linear PSs. Hope it sounds good.

Cheers. Sounds fine so far, though I generally can't hear any difference between amps unless there is some obvious nonlinearity or insufficient power. I went with the Hypex because they seem to be the only Class D that is flat into any load(but I might have overlooked others).

Edited by Stevesie
  • Like 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...
To Top