andyr Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 I wondered if anyone here has done a straight swap ... and what their opinion is of the result? I’ve just changed the cable which goes from my 4-way digital source selector into my miniDSP unit, from optical to coax (RCA). Sitting down to listen to a CD I know well (Fat Freddy's Drop "Based on a True Story") ... I am flabbergasted by how much my system is sounding better - in fact, very much improved. Bass extends deeper and seems fuller - and transients are more incisive ... and that's for a start! Who would've thunk it would make that much difference? (Although to be fair, I understand it is not the optical cable itself which degrades the signal - it's the poor-quality optical-to-copper converters used at either end which are the culprit. It seems that no-one makes high-quality converters. ) Regards, Andy 2
Hydrology Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 Implementation seems to be the key here for which one performs better. One would assume optical is immune to RF noise, but the conversion process can undo all that.
andyr Posted August 13, 2021 Author Posted August 13, 2021 8 minutes ago, Hydrology said: Implementation seems to be the key here for which one performs better. Of course, H - and unfortunately ... implementation trumps theory every time! 8 minutes ago, Hydrology said: One would assume optical is immune to RF noise, Not only that - it provides galvanic isolation (which can prevent ground-loop hum). 8 minutes ago, Hydrology said: but the conversion process can undo all that. And that's where the rubber hits the road! AIUI - unlike just about any thing else used in hifi equipment (capacitors, wire, resistors, connectors) ... there are no makers of quality optical-to-copper converters. There are only a few makers of cheap o-t-c converters ... which everyone (whether hi-end or low-end) must use. I posted bcoz I was interested to know whether anyone else had found such a great improvement, going from an optical interconnect to a copper digital interconnect. Andy
stereo coffee Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 Hi Andy Actually the opposite, I stumbled across a optical cable that is IMO better than coax. It uses a braid over its entire length. Cheers / Chris
muon* Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 In the disk spinners I have owned that have had both optical and coax, the coax connection sounded much better every time in every one of them.
Bunno77 Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 Shows how important experimenting is in the Hifi world. Unfortunately we don't all have access to heaps of equipment but many would benefit from more experimenting 1
bob_m_54 Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 47 minutes ago, stereo coffee said: Hi Andy Actually the opposite, I stumbled across a optical cable that is IMO better than coax. It uses a braid over its entire length. Cheers / Chris So what do you think the braid over an optical cable achieves? 1
stereo coffee Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, bob_m_54 said: So what do you think the braid over an optical cable achieves? Well obvious is better sound quality, some of the best I have ever heard. Less obvious is exactly why. I will need to disassemble one, to arrive at a possible answer for you.
andyr Posted August 13, 2021 Author Posted August 13, 2021 1 hour ago, stereo coffee said: Hi Andy Actually the opposite, I stumbled across a optical cable that is IMO better than coax. It uses a braid over its entire length. Cheers / Chris How very interesting, Chris - as optical cable is supposed not to suffer from RFI ingress. (Which an earthed shield prevents.) And how does the braid get earthed, given the optical connectors at each end? I'd be interested in buying one - just to see if I get the same thing in my system. Can you provide a link? Andy
stereo coffee Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 1 minute ago, andyr said: How very interesting, Chris - as optical cable is supposed not to suffer from RFI ingress. (Which an earthed shield prevents.) And how does the braid get earthed, given the optical connectors at each end? I'd be interested in buying one - just to see if I get the same thing in my system. Can you provide a link? Andy Hi Andy Its a 2metre cable made by EMK with a part number EMK019-002. I obtained the 10 cables I have from eBay.
stereo coffee Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 14 minutes ago, andyr said: How very interesting, Chris - as optical cable is supposed not to suffer from RFI ingress. (Which an earthed shield prevents.) And how does the braid get earthed, given the optical connectors at each end? I'd be interested in buying one - just to see if I get the same thing in my system. Can you provide a link? Andy Likely not earthed directly, rather if we think of earthing then it may, ( or may not ) fall under loose classification of offering a Faraday shield of sorts. Faraday shields are explained here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage Then again I know with the parts I use, there are very unique relationships, to semiconductors where light is used. I need to disassemble a cable to begin putting my finger on, what it might be doing so well.
bob_m_54 Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 1 hour ago, andyr said: How very interesting, Chris - as optical cable is supposed not to suffer from RFI ingress. (Which an earthed shield prevents.) And how does the braid get earthed, given the optical connectors at each end? I'd be interested in buying one - just to see if I get the same thing in my system. Can you provide a link? Andy It doesn't, fibre optical data transmission is immune to RFI/EMI 1
stereo coffee Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 2 hours ago, bob_m_54 said: It doesn't, fibre optical data transmission is immune to RFI/EMI If it was just red light spectrum itself with no other materials involved, we would indeed have less to consider, but that is not the case with many forms of cable construction materials and lengths. We can see the influence of different materials being used in a 2008 document produced by Toshiba that change permissible data rates upward with certain better construction. Page 3 as example shows a sheathing. I also like to keep in mind the work of Hendrik Lorenz https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_phenomena & particularly his first paper at Reference 4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrik_Lorentz We can see evidence of particle theory allowing visibility of influence of magnetism , under certain set conditions. Fiber-Optic Devices TOSLINK.pdf 1
Ittaku Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 Those explanations sound far fetched to me. The most likely explanation is simply a better connector at the end of the cable. The toslink connector is not the best design in the world.
Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted August 13, 2021 Volunteer Posted August 13, 2021 4 hours ago, stereo coffee said: If it was just red light spectrum itself with no other materials involved, we would indeed have less to consider, but that is not the case with many forms of cable construction materials and lengths. We can see the influence of different materials being used in a 2008 document produced by Toshiba that change permissible data rates upward with certain better construction. Page 3 as example shows a sheathing. I also like to keep in mind the work of Hendrik Lorenz https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_phenomena & particularly his first paper at Reference 4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrik_Lorentz We can see evidence of particle theory allowing visibility of influence of magnetism , under certain set conditions. Fiber-Optic Devices TOSLINK.pdf 852.73 kB · 0 downloads That gif is fun to watch. But how is a bending electron beam relevant to the discussion?
stereo coffee Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 1 hour ago, sir sanders zingmore said: That gif is fun to watch. But how is a bending electron beam relevant to the discussion? It was very briefly showing particle physics has different explanation. Glad you enjoyed it
bob_m_54 Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 6 hours ago, stereo coffee said: If it was just red light spectrum itself with no other materials involved, we would indeed have less to consider, but that is not the case with many forms of cable construction materials and lengths. We can see the influence of different materials being used in a 2008 document produced by Toshiba that change permissible data rates upward with certain better construction. Page 3 as example shows a sheathing. I also like to keep in mind the work of Hendrik Lorenz https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_phenomena & particularly his first paper at Reference 4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrik_Lorentz We can see evidence of particle theory allowing visibility of influence of magnetism , under certain set conditions. Fiber-Optic Devices TOSLINK.pdf 852.73 kB · 1 download see my previous post...
stereo coffee Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, bob_m_54 said: see my previous post... and my subsequent post. 1
Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted August 14, 2021 Volunteer Posted August 14, 2021 34 minutes ago, stereo coffee said: It was very briefly showing particle physics has different explanation. Glad you enjoyed it It’s misleading though. It’s as misleading as implying that optical cables need to be shielded from gravity (it bends light too after all)
bob_m_54 Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 (edited) https://www.prysmiancable.com.au/documents/optical-ground-wire.pdf/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_attached_cable https://www.vialite.com/resources/guides/what-is-rf-over-fiber-technology/ https://micronor.com/why-fiber-optic/ Edited August 14, 2021 by bob_m_54 1
Volunteer sir sanders zingmore Posted August 14, 2021 Volunteer Posted August 14, 2021 1 hour ago, bob_m_54 said: https://micronor.com/why-fiber-optic/ High EMI/RFI Fiber optics is immune to any electrical interference. If the concern is EMI/RFI interference, then fiber optics is the only choice. High Magnetic Fields Fiber Optics is immune to any magnetic interference. Deployment within electrical motors, transformers or MRI bore will not affect the optical signal. 1
Anthony1 Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 S/PDIF (RCA Coax) via 75 Ohm cable can sound fantastic. And for too long I thought it would be a lesser format compared to AES/EBU. Optical has obvious limits in my experience (but didn’t use a megabuck cable). The S/PDIF breakthrough came when a CrystalCable digital cable 75 Ohm was installed, superb sound. In summary I’m not surprised andyr also found the S/PDIF can sound great.
Addicted to music Posted August 15, 2021 Posted August 15, 2021 On 13/08/2021 at 5:17 PM, andyr said: Who would've thunk it would make that much difference? (Although to be fair, I understand it is not the optical cable itself which degrades the signal - it's the poor-quality optical-to-copper converters used at either end which are the culprit. It seems that no-one makes high-quality converters. ) Regards, Andy Optical cables can be physically compromised, alway make sure they solidly clip in on the ends as this is the week point. To check whether a optical cable is working shine both ends at a light source and ensure that the light intensity are identical out of each ends, if one end is brighter than the other it’s faulty.
Recommended Posts